Art is subjective. I'm not looking for people's praise.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Art is so subjective, and people can react however they want.
I'm glad I made a piece of art that can be interpreted so widely. Art is always interpreted subjectively.
Art is good, bad, boring, ugly, useful to us or not.
Some artists claim praise is irrelevant in measuring the success of art, but I think it's quite relevant. Besides, it makes me feel great.
Art is a subjective thing, and it should be a subjective thing. And the difficulty of subjectivity is that it becomes hugely problematized when you start applying large sums of money to art objects. That's where it all starts to get a bit sticky.
Not all art is great; most of it's rubbish.
I view art as an inspirational tool.
I mean, art for art's sake is ridiculous. Art is for the sake of one's needs.
A lot of people are intimated by art, but it's something to be revered beyond criticism.
There's a point where art is not subjective, and my example for that is Picasso. If you don't like Picasso, that's your problem.