Search folks don't understand editorial. I'm not afraid of editorial costs, just like machine-search folks are not afraid of computer servers.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
One thing I can say right off the bat is that creating great editorial is a huge challenge, and you can't help but go through the process and not appreciate how valuable this skill is, and how much I admire the people who do this every day.
Social media is key to promoting the editorial posts on my website.
I believe our editorial decisions reflected our constant desire to make sure that we fully cover and analyze any issue and give our viewers all the information they need.
But the power of science lies in open publication, which, with the rise of the Internet, is no longer constrained by the price of paper.
Most people don't read editorial pages. I think I must have been 40 before I even looked at an editorial page.
I think the search engines are the new equivalent of publishing: an enabler of information.
Eventually the consumer will come to appreciate the editorial point of view of every different brand. User-generated content without editorial oversight will simply be background noise.
Search is not just an activity or a destination. It's becoming more integrated and more of a platform.
There won't be editors in the future with the Internet world, with citizen reporting. That doesn't scare me.
The largest issue with search is that we learned about it when the web was young, when the universe was 'complete' - the entire web was searchable! Now our digital lives are utterly fractured - in apps, in walled gardens like Facebook, across clunky interfaces like those in automobiles or Comcast cable boxes.
No opposing quotes found.