I struggle with the idea of comparing people's work and art. The notion of giving awards or putting a competitive spin on something that is a relative art form is sort of odd to me.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Awards for arts, where you make comparisons, don't make much sense.
Unless you are a born connoisseur of art, you will not be able to judge by yourself why certain art is superior to other art.
Art is a subjective thing, and it should be a subjective thing. And the difficulty of subjectivity is that it becomes hugely problematized when you start applying large sums of money to art objects. That's where it all starts to get a bit sticky.
The role of art in society differs for every artist.
I am always rethinking how art is perceived and received, questioning our relationship to art. That's always been a constant.
Art is essentially communication. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. That's why people make art, so other people can relate to it.
When I judge art, I take my painting and put it next to a God made object like a tree or flower. If it clashes, it is not art.
Art is subjective. I'm not looking for people's praise.
Art is so subjective, and people can react however they want.
Making art is different for everyone.
No opposing quotes found.