All we do is bring the debate from both sides, and let you as a viewer decide where you want to end up on the issue. That's very important. That's exactly what happens in 'Redemption Inc.'
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We also have issue oriented storylines which are an examination of an issue, be it ethical or social.
I've participated in meetings where there were concerns by ethical experts. There is no clear solution.
When we can commit a crime, we can also trigger debate. Cases go to courts. Media start covering the cases. But once you build smart environments where, if you meet a certain probabilistic profile, you won't even be allowed to board a bus, let alone commit a crime, we're perpetuating existing laws so they face no challenges or revision.
A debate has one purpose, one purpose only, and that is to facilitate the exchange of ideas directly between two candidates, and that's it.
I raise this objection to debate the process, and protect the integrity of the true will of the people.
My concern is that contention is becoming accepted as a way of life.
I think a lot of moral debates are not over what is the basis of justice, but who gets a ticket to play in the game.
For me it's more important that I outline all the facets of a controversial issue and let the reader make up his or her mind. I don't care if readers change their minds, but I would like readers to ask themselves why their opinion is what it is.
Let us hold our discussion together in our own persons, making trial of the truth and of ourselves.
You can much better have an influence on the debate when you sit at the bargaining table and you can give input.