Relevance is a search engine's holy grail. People want results that are closely connected to their queries.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Relevance, for me, is about being creative and doing things that you believe in, whether that's music or acting or painting a picture, or whatever that is.
The birth of the search engine, it's nothing new: it's essentially embedded in our literature; it's how ideas relate, how the mind makes connections. I mean, connections are made online through links, and within an algorithm, they're made through degrees of relevancy between different terms.
The ultimate search engine would basically understand everything in the world, and it would always give you the right thing. And we're a long, long ways from that.
I think the search engines are the new equivalent of publishing: an enabler of information.
There are excellent public interest grounds to have a search engine whose rankings are transparent.
People who want alternative information have to try so hard to find it.
That is really not much different from the search engines that are being constructed today for users throughout the entire world to allow them to search through databases to access the information that they require.
Google is basically this idea that sites that link to other sites create a better way to search.
If you know what you want, you use Google. But if you don't know what you want, and you want to be surprised and find something you didn't expect, we want you come to StumbleUpon. Really, that idea of being a discovery engine versus a search engine.
Never question the relevance of truth, but always question the truth of relevance.
No opposing quotes found.