Quote

They tend to be pretty abstract ones then, like doing what will have the best consequences; obviously you wouldn't specify what consequences are best, they may be different in some circumstances, so at a lower, more specific level, you may well get differences.

You can't make assumptions when you're dealing with health issues.

The test is can you do something, rather than have a theoretical argument - can you make a difference?

Our goal should be to understand our differences.

In a government whose distinguishing characteristic should be a diffusion and equalization of its benefits and burdens the advantage of individuals will be augmented at the expense of the community at large.

You can see over time whether people are prepared to differ or not.

I've found that small wins, small projects, small differences often make huge differences.

Still, intuitive assumptions about behavior is only the starting point of systematic analysis, for alone they do not yield many interesting implications.

Government cannot ensure equal results because every individual differs.