If you don't have a real stake in the new, then just surviving on the old - even if it is about efficiency - I don't think is a long-term game.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I see myself playing as long as I am partially enjoying the game and partially successful and they are paying me. But honestly, two more years is about all I can take.
As a new entrepreneur, you need a stake in the game, but you can't risk it all.
If you invest in something a little more expensive with longevity, you'll use it more.
If it were up to me, I'd rather create things that last long-term, but my thrill comes from reflecting what's going on now.
I believe it's less risky long-term to embrace change.
Most people are fortunate enough to stay two, three years in this game. I've been in it for seven years, and I feel like now, I'm just beginning.
My view is there's no bad time to innovate.
I'm not saying that I'm going to retire from game development altogether.
You retire, but you're still aching to play. But in order to play, you have to resist certain temptations, and train hard. And I just didn't have the desire to do that any more.
If you're afraid of inflation, I think - and if you can bring yourself to have a long horizon - and when I say long, I mean ten to 20 years, not the usual ten to 20 weeks - that locking up resources in the ground is a terrific idea.
No opposing quotes found.