When it comes to art and science, people don't like a lot of either. Instead of being open to it, they're closed off about it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Art and science are intrinsically the same except for one thing. The universe is in control of your science, whether it's right or wrong, and the public are in control of your art - if they're going to buy it, if you're going to make a living that way.
I would say the connection between art and science is very tenuous for me. It's just that I'm interested in both. I don't think that my interest in art affects the kind of science that I do.
I don't think we have reached a point where art really translates into science. Perhaps for some people, having good visuals can help translate into science.
Art is so subjective, and people can react however they want.
Art and science have so much in common - the process of trial and error, finding something new and innovative, and to experiment and succeed in a breakthrough.
I would like people to appreciate science in the same way they appreciate the arts.
When I was in high school, I fell under the spell of that crazy idea that if you're interested in the arts, you can't be interested in science.
The art world is a very prissy little thing over in the corner, while the major cultural forces are being determined by techno science.
I think there are a lot more important things than art in the world. But not to me.
What is the intersection between technology, art and science? Curiosity and wonder, because it drives us to explore, because we're surrounded by things we can't see.
No opposing quotes found.